|
|
|
05-03-2007, 05:56 PM
|
#9 |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,606
Rep Power: 281
|
>How can you say fewer lives would have been lost when only 1 man had a gun as opposed to 100 people having a gun, when our own nations history tells the exact opposite story?
Because it's a reasonable assumption that none of the other likely-to-be-armed students wanted to go on a murderous rampage and it's a logical conclusion that if any other student had killed Cho before he could finish fewer lives would have been lost. |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Threaded Mode