Supreme Court could take guns case

Al Swearengen · 11-15-2007, 03:42 AM

Quote:

That's seriously what you're going to go with? A cut & paste job from Wikipedia that doesn't actually refute anything?

I didn't use it to refute anything, I used it to support my contention that your fixation with minutia is annoyin to me and probably everyone else ya interact with...and it drove that point home quite nicely! Besides, the term isn't as outdated as ya say...it's still in the vernacular, as in "Joe is quite anal about everything".

Quote:

They don't fit, Freud is almost completely discredited; especially B.S. like "anal retentive."

Ha! You're doin it again, and ya dont even realize it...you're completely oblivious to it! Ya just proved my point...the damn shoes fit and you're wearin em! Face it Joe, you're anal, and it's apparent to everyone butt you (pardon the pun)! You're like a guy with halitosis who insists his breath isn't foul since he himself can't smell it. And "Freud is almost completely discredited"... really Dr. Pole? I dont think you're qualified to make that pronouncement. But hey, whatever....knock yourself out.

joepole · 11-15-2007, 09:51 AM

Anyone that can read is qualified to make that pronouncement.

What was that deal you were talking about earlier? Selectively ignoring direct questions? Does you have anything to offer besides nonsensical, grammatically flaccid ad hominem arguments? Some more false statements about crime would at least be a little more interesting to read.

Isaac-Saxxon · 11-15-2007, 10:01 AM

Morpheus is fighting Neo ....................

Click image for larger version

Name: Neo-Morph-kungfu.jpg
Views: 4
Size: 17.6 KB
ID: 1821

Morpheus · 11-15-2007, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joepole

Selectively ignoring direct questions?

You mean like when I directly questioned your source for the number of offspring produced by physicians versus the number produced by felons?

rhertz · 11-15-2007, 02:50 PM

I dunno. I asked him if he had a gun and he whipped out a 44 magnum! Be careful guys!

joepole · 11-15-2007, 03:31 PM

>You mean like when I directly questioned your source for the number of offspring produced by physicians versus the number produced by felons?
Read that one on the toilet and didn't respond.

I'm at the office now so I don't have access to the book from which I acquired that factoid, so I'll have to post it tonight. The link between lack of education, crime, and birth rate isn't exactly a secret.

Take this, for example, from the CDC. A high school dropout has twice the birthrate of a woman. The number are even more disparate among men. The accidental pregnancy rate among women with IQs over 125 is almost 0.

Morpheus · 11-15-2007, 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joepole

>You mean like when I directly questioned your source for the number of offspring produced by physicians versus the number produced by felons?
Read that one on the toilet and didn't respond.

I'm at the office now so I don't have access to the book from which I acquired that factoid, so I'll have to post it tonight. The link between lack of education, crime, and birth rate isn't exactly a secret.

Take this, for example, from the CDC. A high school dropout has twice the birthrate of a woman. The number are even more disparate among men. The accidental pregnancy rate among women with IQs over 125 is almost 0.

Hey I hear ya Joe, and I said I agreed with you in spirit. I just thought it curious that you picked physicians specifically.

Morpheus · 11-15-2007, 06:20 PM

Hey Joe, here is part of the abstract from the link you provided.

Results—Birth rates differ considerably by educational attainment. In 1994
women with 0–8 years of education had the highest birth rates overall, while those who started but did not complete college had the lowest. For women 30–39 years of age, however, those with college degrees had the highest rates. Among women aged 25 years and older, unmarried women with less education have much higher birth rates than unmarried women who attended school longer. Conversely, rates for college educated married women are much higher than those of less educated women. For college-educated women, low first birth rates for women in their twenties and high rates for women in their thirties point to the continuing trend of delayed childbearing.

joepole · 11-15-2007, 06:20 PM

I think it was actually worded as "people with 16+ years of education," which doctors obviously are.

Al Swearengen · 11-15-2007, 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joepole

Does you have anything to offer besides nonsensical, grammatically flaccid ad hominem arguments?

"Grammatically flaccid"? "Does I"? No, I doesn't! Now please go away.

joepole · 11-16-2007, 09:54 AM

I tried writing "Al style" but that was all my fingers would let me do.

joepole · 11-16-2007, 09:57 AM

Those are birth rates for first babies. A woman that has her first baby when she's 35 isn't going to have as many babies as one who drops foal when she's 18.

Isaac-Saxxon · 11-16-2007, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joepole

Those are birth rates for first babies. A woman that has her first baby when she's 35 isn't going to have as many babies as one who drops foal when she's 18.

Joe when yo mama dropped foal you must have been breech

yep arse first

11-15-2007, 10:01 AM	#3
Isaac-Saxxon SBLive! Veteran Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 4,421 Rep Power: 340	Morpheus is fighting Neo .................... __________________ Maranatha Mat 7:14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-15-2007, 09:51 AM	#2
joepole SBLive! Veteran Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 1,606 Rep Power: 281	Anyone that can read is qualified to make that pronouncement. What was that deal you were talking about earlier? Selectively ignoring direct questions? Does you have anything to offer besides nonsensical, grammatically flaccid ad hominem arguments? Some more false statements about crime would at least be a little more interesting to read.

11-15-2007, 02:50 PM	#5
rhertz SBLive! Veteran Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,834 Rep Power: 316	I dunno. I asked him if he had a gun and he whipped out a 44 magnum! Be careful guys!

11-15-2007, 03:31 PM	#6
joepole SBLive! Veteran Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 1,606 Rep Power: 281	>You mean like when I directly questioned your source for the number of offspring produced by physicians versus the number produced by felons? Read that one on the toilet and didn't respond. I'm at the office now so I don't have access to the book from which I acquired that factoid, so I'll have to post it tonight. The link between lack of education, crime, and birth rate isn't exactly a secret. Take this, for example, from the CDC. A high school dropout has twice the birthrate of a woman. The number are even more disparate among men. The accidental pregnancy rate among women with IQs over 125 is almost 0.

11-15-2007, 06:20 PM	#8
Morpheus Advanced Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 499 Rep Power: 246	Hey Joe, here is part of the abstract from the link you provided. Results—Birth rates differ considerably by educational attainment. In 1994 women with 0–8 years of education had the highest birth rates overall, while those who started but did not complete college had the lowest. For women 30–39 years of age, however, those with college degrees had the highest rates. Among women aged 25 years and older, unmarried women with less education have much higher birth rates than unmarried women who attended school longer. Conversely, rates for college educated married women are much higher than those of less educated women. For college-educated women, low first birth rates for women in their twenties and high rates for women in their thirties point to the continuing trend of delayed childbearing.

11-16-2007, 09:54 AM	#11
joepole SBLive! Veteran Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 1,606 Rep Power: 281	I tried writing "Al style" but that was all my fingers would let me do.

11-16-2007, 09:57 AM	#12
joepole SBLive! Veteran Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 1,606 Rep Power: 281	Those are birth rates for first babies. A woman that has her first baby when she's 35 isn't going to have as many babies as one who drops foal when she's 18.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)