Man Found Half Naked With Inflatable Doll in Iowa Public Restroom

joepole · 10-29-2007, 10:56 AM

Weird. I wonder why?

That's kind of stupid, sex with a doll is less gross than what people are supposed to be doing in there.

piemaker720 · 10-29-2007, 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joepole

Weird. I wonder why?

That's kind of stupid, sex with a doll is less gross than what people are supposed to be doing in there.

If he wants to do those things, do it in private, not in a public restroom.

joepole · 10-29-2007, 12:23 PM

A stall isn't public restroom isn't private? It's against the law to record someone in there so it meets the "expectation of privacy" standard.

If you can poop there you should be able to do anything else that requires privacy. Again, screwing a doll is less gross than taking a dump.

Pocahontas · 10-29-2007, 02:42 PM

This guy must have a doll fetish. According to the article he was busted in a dark alley previously with a bridal mannequin! I would think if he was in the restroom on the floor with his pants down for all to see would definitely be considered indecent exposure. I wouldn't want to witness it!

joepole · 10-29-2007, 03:00 PM

If I had to choose between seeing a guy with his wioner stuck inside a doll and a guy dropping a deuce, I'd go with the former.

Pocahontas · 10-29-2007, 03:24 PM

They would both most likely be considered indecent if done in view of the public.I would hope and pray not to ever see either but if I did I would expect some kind of legal intervention as to deter future indecencies!

AnimeSpirit · 10-29-2007, 03:28 PM

Taking a dump in a public restroom is normal and acceptable because that is what such facilities are intended for. Having your way with a doll in a public restroom, if not indecent exposure, is lewd public behavior. Why? Because others who use the facilities during your "session" would be exposed to said lewd behavior (including any minors who happen to walk in to use the facilities).

Yes, it is illegal! Yes, it is more disgusting (if not hygienically, then morally) than simply taking a dump. Yes, people can commit such actions, but only in their homes or other such personal surroundings.

joepole · 10-29-2007, 03:37 PM

>Having your way with a doll in a public restroom, if not indecent exposure, is lewd public behavior

Assuming the guy is inside a stall, how is anyone exposed to what he is doing? How is anything in there considered "public" anything? If I take a dump on the sidewalk I get arrested, right? I have to do that in a facility designed to provide personal privacy in a public space. That's what restrooms are for.

>Yes, it is more disgusting (if not hygienically, then morally) than simply taking a dump.

It is much, much less disgusting. Morally, who cares? You can't (and shouldn't) legislate morality. Even if you did, there is nothing immoral about humping a doll. Weird? Maybe, but certainly no immoral than masturbating without a doll or having sex with a real human.

If I walk into a public restroom I know there is a decent chance I am going to see some other dude's dong unless I purposely avoid looking. What possible difference should what he is doing with that dong make?

Isaac-Saxxon · 10-29-2007, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joepole

If I had to choose between seeing a guy with his wioner stuck inside a doll and a guy dropping a deuce, I'd go with the former.

Joe you sound like you have been to this fire before

Do you own a inflatable yourself ?

10-29-2007, 02:42 PM	#4
Pocahontas SBLive! Veteran Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,691 Rep Power: 294	This guy must have a doll fetish. According to the article he was busted in a dark alley previously with a bridal mannequin! I would think if he was in the restroom on the floor with his pants down for all to see would definitely be considered indecent exposure. I wouldn't want to witness it! __________________ "The greater your capacity to love, the greater your capacity to feel the pain." Jennifer Aniston

10-29-2007, 03:24 PM	#6
Pocahontas SBLive! Veteran Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,691 Rep Power: 294	They would both most likely be considered indecent if done in view of the public.I would hope and pray not to ever see either but if I did I would expect some kind of legal intervention as to deter future indecencies! __________________ "The greater your capacity to love, the greater your capacity to feel the pain." Jennifer Aniston

10-29-2007, 03:28 PM	#7
AnimeSpirit SBLive! Veteran Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Nowhere Age: 43 Posts: 1,659 Rep Power: 284	Taking a dump in a public restroom is normal and acceptable because that is what such facilities are intended for. Having your way with a doll in a public restroom, if not indecent exposure, is lewd public behavior. Why? Because others who use the facilities during your "session" would be exposed to said lewd behavior (including any minors who happen to walk in to use the facilities). Yes, it is illegal! Yes, it is more disgusting (if not hygienically, then morally) than simply taking a dump. Yes, people can commit such actions, but only in their homes or other such personal surroundings. __________________ Confuscious says~

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

10-29-2007, 10:56 AM	#1
joepole SBLive! Veteran Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 1,606 Rep Power: 281	Weird. I wonder why? That's kind of stupid, sex with a doll is less gross than what people are supposed to be doing in there.

10-29-2007, 12:23 PM	#3
joepole SBLive! Veteran Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 1,606 Rep Power: 281	A stall isn't public restroom isn't private? It's against the law to record someone in there so it meets the "expectation of privacy" standard. If you can poop there you should be able to do anything else that requires privacy. Again, screwing a doll is less gross than taking a dump.

10-29-2007, 03:00 PM	#5
joepole SBLive! Veteran Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 1,606 Rep Power: 281	If I had to choose between seeing a guy with his wioner stuck inside a doll and a guy dropping a deuce, I'd go with the former.

10-29-2007, 03:37 PM	#8
joepole SBLive! Veteran Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 1,606 Rep Power: 281	>Having your way with a doll in a public restroom, if not indecent exposure, is lewd public behavior Assuming the guy is inside a stall, how is anyone exposed to what he is doing? How is anything in there considered "public" anything? If I take a dump on the sidewalk I get arrested, right? I have to do that in a facility designed to provide personal privacy in a public space. That's what restrooms are for. >Yes, it is more disgusting (if not hygienically, then morally) than simply taking a dump. It is much, much less disgusting. Morally, who cares? You can't (and shouldn't) legislate morality. Even if you did, there is nothing immoral about humping a doll. Weird? Maybe, but certainly no immoral than masturbating without a doll or having sex with a real human. If I walk into a public restroom I know there is a decent chance I am going to see some other dude's dong unless I purposely avoid looking. What possible difference should what he is doing with that dong make?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)