Go Back   Shreveport.com > Public Forums > Government & Politics

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-14-2007, 11:12 PM   #1
joepole
SBLive! Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,606
Rep Power: 281 joepole has much to be proud of joepole has much to be proud of joepole has much to be proud of joepole has much to be proud of joepole has much to be proud of joepole has much to be proud of joepole has much to be proud of joepole has much to be proud of joepole has much to be proud of
You (or the article by way of you) left out the above quoted text I copied from the bill itself. A pretty important part, i might add.

>Also, you either failed to read or comprehend the language of the bill..."It shall be unlawful for any person...to possess in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition."

That is just flat out wrong. Did you actually read the bill or did you just trust that "American Rifleman" had all the facts straight? The portion of the bill that is referring to is the part that amends USC 18.922(d) which reads:

"It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm or ammunition to any person knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that such person—"

...and then it goes on to list 9 conditions under which it is illegal to sell a person a gun. This new bill adds a 10th:

"(10) has been the subject of a determination by the Attorney General under section 922A, 922B, 923(d)(1)(H), or 923(e) of this title.'."
joepole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2007, 11:30 PM   #2
Al Swearengen
Advanced Member
 
Al Swearengen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 849
Rep Power: 269 Al Swearengen has a brilliant future Al Swearengen has a brilliant future Al Swearengen has a brilliant future Al Swearengen has a brilliant future Al Swearengen has a brilliant future Al Swearengen has a brilliant future Al Swearengen has a brilliant future Al Swearengen has a brilliant future Al Swearengen has a brilliant future Al Swearengen has a brilliant future Al Swearengen has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by joepole
You (or the article by way of you) left out the above quoted text I copied from the bill itself. A pretty important part, i might add.

>Also, you either failed to read or comprehend the language of the bill..."It shall be unlawful for any person...to possess in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition."

That is just flat out wrong. Did you actually read the bill or did you just trust that "American Rifleman" had all the facts straight? The portion of the bill that is referring to is the part that amends USC 18.922(d) which reads:

"It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm or ammunition to any person knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that such person—"

...and then it goes on to list 9 conditions under which it is illegal to sell a person a gun. This new bill adds a 10th:

"(10) has been the subject of a determination by the Attorney General under section 922A, 922B, 923(d)(1)(H), or 923(e) of this title.'."

You're forgettin somethin, aintcha? A lil somethin Mr. Harlan B. Carter said, about "Judge a law by the worst reading, and in the hands of the worst enemies of the Second Amendment." Joe, you're a stickler for detail, but ya blew past that bit of minutia and never looked back, didntcha?
__________________
Molon Labe!

Last edited by Al Swearengen; 06-15-2007 at 12:19 AM.
Al Swearengen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2007, 06:05 AM   #3
BrainSmashR
Banned
 
BrainSmashR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Natchitoches
Age: 54
Posts: 1,090
Rep Power: 0 BrainSmashR will become famous soon enough
Send a message via ICQ to BrainSmashR Send a message via AIM to BrainSmashR Send a message via MSN to BrainSmashR Send a message via Yahoo to BrainSmashR
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Swearengen
You're forgettin somethin, aintcha? A lil somethin Mr. Harlan B. Carter said, about "Judge a law by the worst reading, and in the hands of the worst enemies of the Second Amendment." Joe, you're a stickler for detail, but ya blew past that bit of minutia and never looked back, didntcha?

And do YOU really think using the worst possible case scenario is the best way to judge this law? That's like locking your daughter in the basement because she might get raped and murdered in the outside world one day. Justifying your actions with the worst possible case scenario.

I'm a firm believer in The Patriot Act, and have fully supported it's use in every instance that I'm aware of....

As for LN comments, DUDE.....don't you think it's pretty difficult for a normal, hard working, tax paying citizen to be labeled an enemy combatant?

And let's face it....if you're calling or making any kind of transaction with any person in/from/or around the middle east, then I want the govt. watching your @$$ too!!
BrainSmashR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2007, 12:36 PM   #4
joepole
SBLive! Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,606
Rep Power: 281 joepole has much to be proud of joepole has much to be proud of joepole has much to be proud of joepole has much to be proud of joepole has much to be proud of joepole has much to be proud of joepole has much to be proud of joepole has much to be proud of joepole has much to be proud of
If judging a law by the worst reading, and in the hands of the worst enemies of the Second Amendment includes the ability to make up words that aren't there then there's no point in even discussing any law ever.

For the record I don't like this law and hope it doesn't pass. I don't like it for legit reasons, though, not the fictitious ones given in the above article.
joepole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2007, 10:16 PM   #5
rhertz
SBLive! Veteran
 
rhertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,834
Rep Power: 316 rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by joepole
For the record I don't like this law and hope it doesn't pass. I don't like it for legit reasons, though, not the fictitious ones given in the above article.
Yeah but isn't that often the case with legislation? As I grow older I have a tendancy to vote "nay" when it doubt. Not that I fear change, but rather I respect my ancestor's morals more as I grow older. If it aint' broke, then don't fix it!
rhertz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2007, 10:10 AM   #6
Isaac-Saxxon
SBLive! Veteran
 
Isaac-Saxxon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,421
Rep Power: 340 Isaac-Saxxon has a brilliant future Isaac-Saxxon has a brilliant future Isaac-Saxxon has a brilliant future Isaac-Saxxon has a brilliant future Isaac-Saxxon has a brilliant future Isaac-Saxxon has a brilliant future Isaac-Saxxon has a brilliant future Isaac-Saxxon has a brilliant future Isaac-Saxxon has a brilliant future Isaac-Saxxon has a brilliant future Isaac-Saxxon has a brilliant future
We sure do not need more laws to add to the long list of what we can not do.
I would say the police can not enforce the ones on the books now.
__________________
Maranatha
Mat 7:14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
Isaac-Saxxon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 AM.


Design By: Miner Skinz.com
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
2008 Shreveport.com