![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,834
Rep Power: 316
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,606
Rep Power: 281
|
When some idiot gives one to someone else and it causes a problem/liability, like in this case.
Which do you think is a better policy, one that spells out individual drugs by chemical formula/brand name, detailing which are allowed by whom and under what circumstances, or one that says "no drugs, period?" especially when there is no upside to allowing any. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,834
Rep Power: 316
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,421
Rep Power: 340
|
They have a zero tolerance policy all the time. I think it is a bit to much. I think they should have a list of stuff like Advil or aspirin or midol what ever it might be that they can walk in the store and buy for legal use. I have not had to deal with this issue with my children but the schools run from the lawyers all the time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,606
Rep Power: 281
|
>Or maybe the school should keep any and all drugs in their possession and when students needs to take their meds, they go to the office to do so.
That is what the policy is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,834
Rep Power: 316
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|