How do you eat your snack crackers?

[TheNarrator]

Originally Posted by Isaac-Saxxon

No cardigan or corduroy pants Santaboy and neither of you two are proven studs may think you are but no children so no proof
I see you two have become good buddies

Attachment 423

Having children automatically means you're attractive? That doesn't really make sense. Are you implying that because you've had children, you've had sexual intercourse, which means someone found you attractive enough to have sex with?

Haha, I'm just really boggled by your statement.

[BrainSmashR]

Originally Posted by TheNarrator

Having children automatically means you're attractive? That doesn't really make sense. Are you implying that because you've had children, you've had sexual intercourse, which means someone found you attractive enough to have sex with?

Haha, I'm just really boggled by your statement.

Welcome to the board TheNarrator. I see it didn't take you long to figure out Isaac is full of **** most of the time.

[Isaac-Saxxon]

Originally Posted by BrainSmashR

Welcome to the board TheNarrator. I see it didn't take you long to figure out Isaac is full of **** most of the time.

All TheNarrator has to do dip **** is look at your red boxes next to your lame avatar and see what everyone on this board thinks of your post. You do hang in their against all odds maybe one day we will find out where the red boxes end when you are gone or you can continue to make new avatars and post on either way your bull **** will smell the same

[BrainSmashR]

Originally Posted by Isaac-Saxxon

All TheNarrator has to do dip **** is look at your red boxes next to your lame avatar and see what everyone on this board thinks of your post. You do hang in their against all odds maybe one day we will find out where the red boxes end when you are gone or you can continue to make new avatars and post on either way your bull **** will smell the same

And we all know that right and wrong are decided by popularity contest too, don't we, dumbass?

[BrainSmashR]

Don't you see the kind of people you are trying to rationalize with narrator. TBelle and Isaac are the worst. Have your fun with them, but don't even bother trying to correct their stupidity. They spend their days reading the bible and are content with getting dumber and more out of touch with reality everday, rather than trying to improve their level of intelligence like the rest of the world.

You see, since Isaac said one CANNOT be 3 a : a young man : GUY; especially : one who is virile and promiscuous b : a tough person c : HUNK 2 then TBelle is going to ride that sinking ship with him all the way to the bottom. It happens every time and it doesn't matter how completely hillbilly stupid the statement is or how many dictionary definitions you link to.

[BrainSmashR]

One has to wonder where Deadbeat Dads who abandon the children they've "sired" fit into Isaac and TBelle's fantasyland.

According to them, Deadbeat Dads must be studs because they have children, but I'd be willing to bet an intelligent woman doesn't find anything studly about child abandonment.....

[Texasbelle]

Originally Posted by TheNarrator

Having children automatically means you're attractive? That doesn't really make sense. Are you implying that because you've had children, you've had sexual intercourse, which means someone found you attractive enough to have sex with?

Haha, I'm just really boggled by your statement.

I don't think that having children automatically means someone is attractive. I do think that if someone is happily married, having a great sex life with their partner, etc. then SOMEONE finds them attractive and obviously attractive enough to have sex with. Now your statement was just plain stupid.

[TheNarrator]

Originally Posted by Texasbelle

I don't think that having children automatically means someone is attractive. I do think that if someone is happily married, having a great sex life with their partner, etc. then SOMEONE finds them attractive and obviously attractive enough to have sex with. Now your statement was just plain stupid.

I never made any statements. I asked him two questions trying to verify if I had interpreted correctly what he had said, which was - "neither of you two are proven studs may think you are but no children so no proof".

I think if someone's attractive, then someone's attractive, regardless of if they have a sex life, are married, have children, or not. Just because one abstains from sex or any sort of sexual activity doesn't mean they aren't attractive.

[Santabot]

Originally Posted by TheNarrator

I never made any statements. I asked him two questions trying to verify if I had interpreted correctly what he had said, which was - "neither of you two are proven studs may think you are but no children so no proof".

I think if someone's attractive, then someone's attractive, regardless of if they have a sex life, are married, have children, or not. Just because one abstains from sex or any sort of sexual activity doesn't mean they aren't attractive.

True.

"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder".

It's an opinion, a choice, just like anything else, to think somebody is attractive.

[Texasbelle]

Originally Posted by TheNarrator

I never made any statements. I asked him two questions trying to verify if I had interpreted correctly what he had said, which was - "neither of you two are proven studs may think you are but no children so no proof".

I think if someone's attractive, then someone's attractive, regardless of if they have a sex life, are married, have children, or not. Just because one abstains from sex or any sort of sexual activity doesn't mean they aren't attractive.

Then your question still didn't make sense. A proven stud in the animal world which could directly relate to humans as well is an animal that has sired off spring. So yes children would be required.

[sassy1]

my how things digress...we were talking about snack crackers, right?

[TheNarrator]

Originally Posted by Texasbelle

Then your question still didn't make sense. A proven stud in the animal world which could directly relate to humans as well is an animal that has sired off spring. So yes children would be required.

Though some people act like animals, we are different, so the siring offspring bit doesn't necessarily mean you're attractive. If a woman has a child due to rape, the man still has offspring, but the sex wasn't consensual, so he is not considered attractive- to that woman, at least.
From what I've understood the act of sex itself seems to "prove" that the male and female are attractive, and there need not be children involved.

I don't see how my questions didn't make sense, they were attempts to understand what he meant by his statement; "Having children automatically means you're attractive?" "Are you implying that because you've had children, you've had sexual intercourse, which means someone found you attractive enough to have sex with?"

[Santabot]

Originally Posted by TheNarrator

Though some people act like animals, we are different, so the siring offspring bit doesn't necessarily mean you're attractive. If a woman has a child due to rape, the man still has offspring, but the sex wasn't consensual, so he is not considered attractive- to that woman, at least.
From what I've understood the act of sex itself seems to "prove" that the male and female are attractive, and there need not be children involved.

I don't see how my questions didn't make sense, they were attempts to understand what he meant by his statement; "Having children automatically means you're attractive?" "Are you implying that because you've had children, you've had sexual intercourse, which means someone found you attractive enough to have sex with?"

I don't see how anybody could find her statements confusing.. they make plenty of sense.

Texasbelle is a bit confused, as she posts on a Shreveport board while living in East Texas, a bad sign from the start