|
|
Notices |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
12-03-2007, 08:09 PM | #1 | |
Advanced Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Port Royal
Posts: 288
Rep Power: 225
|
Dixie Chick Urges Donations to Defense Fund for Convicted Murderers
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,314605,00.html
Quote:
Oh, she's at it again. I guess they still believe any press is good press. |
|
12-03-2007, 11:54 PM | #2 |
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,421
Rep Power: 323
|
The chicks need to shut their pie hole and fade away with out anymore disgrace to their name. NOT ! Fools should have taken the money and gone to the house but oh no they think because they can sing a few songs that their politics trump's the day ! NEXT Please !
__________________
Maranatha Mat 7:14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. |
12-04-2007, 09:32 AM | #3 |
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,606
Rep Power: 264
|
Good, I want murderers to have the best defense possible. Especially if they're guilty.
But if they're not guilty, and you believe that they're not guilty, wouldn't doing something to help be a good thing? |
12-04-2007, 10:27 AM | #4 | |
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,834
Rep Power: 299
|
Quote:
|
|
12-04-2007, 11:30 AM | #5 |
SBLive! Veteran
|
I loved their music, but I'm with Isaac. They might as well fade away now, because not even the radio stations will play their music. They haven't had a concert in so long because no one will buy their tickets. Jeez! I'm surprised they don't execute those murderers today just because one of the Chicks supports them.
__________________
Confuscious says~ |
12-04-2007, 11:40 AM | #6 |
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,606
Rep Power: 264
|
>What, they can't afford DNA testing to get them off? That might cost a few thousand dollars. However drumming up millions for top lawyers like OJ did to try to debunk clear forensics is another matter.
I know almost nothing of the specifics of this case. Is it the type of case where "DNA testing" will "get them off?" Most murders aren't. What "clear forensics" are they trying to debunk? I am not aware whether or not they were convicted based on any forensic evidence. Again, most cases aren't. Also, is "debunk" the right word? Debunking is a good thing, it eliminates falsehoods. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|