|
|
01-31-2007, 06:38 PM | #1 | |
Advanced Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 849
Rep Power: 252
|
[SBL Administrators have moved this thread from the MLK thread to be more on topic.]
Quote:
Ya know Matt, when I was a kid, late 60s/early 70s, my parents bought us a set of Realistic (Radio Shack) brand walkie-talkies. Brand new in the box, and they never worked worth a damn. Took em back and swapped em for a new pair several times...they never did work, but hey, we managed to travel 250,000 miles and land on the moon? I have my doubts. Last edited by sbl_admin; 02-01-2007 at 12:14 PM. |
|
01-31-2007, 07:23 PM | #2 | |
Advanced Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 166
Rep Power: 228
|
Quote:
How would you explain to the 100,000+ individuals gathered down at Cape Canaveral who personally witnessed the launch of each of the Apollo Saturn space missions? How about all those amateur astronomers and amateur radio operators who saw and listened and tracked the astronauts along with the government? And how did we fool all those Aboriginies down in Australia? hehehe Not to mention fooling those three scientists down at Parks who where fooling us when they lost power and lost track of Apollo 11? How'd they do that? OK, how did they fool Tom Hanks? Answer that! Or is he one of "them"! |
|
01-31-2007, 08:07 PM | #3 |
Advanced Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 849
Rep Power: 252
|
[quote]How would you explain the 100,000+ individuals gathered down at Cape Canaveral who personally witnessed the launch of each of the Apollo Saturn space missions?[quote]
To this I would simply say that a rocket launch does not a lunar landing make! That would be like saying "I saw you start up your car and drive off, so I KNOW you made it Disney Land!" Amateur astronomers and radio operators? Aboriginies? Tom Hanks? Surely you jest? Im reasonably certain I could get Mr. Hanks to check and see if his shoe laces were tied or that his fly was zipped. The fact of the matter is that it wouldve been far easier to convincibly fake the moon landing than to actually accomplish such a feat, especially given the era's level of technology. Besides, if we really did land on the moon, why have we not colonized it by now...almost half a century later? And where are those missing tapes NeverAStraightAnswer conveniently lost? But why not ask "them"? Im sure "they" would gladly answer these questions to your satisfaction. Fake a moon landing? The good people who brought us such gems as "MKUltra", the "Bay-O-Pigs" fiasco, and "Operation Northwoods"? Why, the United States government would NEVER do THAT! Absurd! Out of the question! Perish the thought! By the way...that last little beauty I mentioned..."Operation Northwoods"...thats for all you trusting souls that dont believe 911 couldve been an inside job! Last edited by Al Swearengen; 01-31-2007 at 10:46 PM. |
01-31-2007, 09:04 PM | #4 |
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,609
Rep Power: 273
|
Hey all, I wouldn't bother to jump into the middle of this one.. Although Al likes to throw this stuff out there.. at the same time, he'll tell you how the moon is of an alien creation, and he knows this because of "eye witness" accounts from some of the astronauts who "landed" on the moon.
just depends on the conversation at hand |
02-01-2007, 12:21 PM | #5 | ||||||
Advanced Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 166
Rep Power: 228
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
One thing is for sure, the undisputable evidence is right above our heads. All those footprints and rover tracks are sitting there just as the day they were made. A good enough telescope should be able to pick up some debris or tracks, but I doubt NASA will use the Hubble to verify what they already know as fact. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||
02-01-2007, 01:40 PM | #6 |
SBLive! Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,421
Rep Power: 323
|
You high jacked my thread
The moon is made of cheese and there is no man in the moon
|
02-01-2007, 05:39 PM | #7 |
Advanced Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 849
Rep Power: 252
|
Sorry about jackin your thread there, Isaac...I just couldnt let this go unchallenged! Cheese eh? Ya might be on to somethin there!
"NeverAStraightAnswer"...thats what NASA stands for these days. Nasa has this annoying habit of airbrushing inconvenient things out of the photos that they release for public consumption. Supposedly, Nasa's charter states that they will firmly adhere to the truth and resist attempts by the U.S. govt to influence, bias, or subvert it's findings. In reality, the agency operates contrary to their own mission statement. Biting the hand that feeds you is never a good idea, is it? Last edited by Al Swearengen; 02-01-2007 at 09:51 PM. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|