>your insistence that I the proposal only affected freshman because that's the only group I used in my example.*
I never** said you did, all I did was correct your way-off estimate of the number of Freshmen and then correct your "there used to be more" defense of your original incorrect estimate.
Again, at no point did I ever claim that you said the law only affected Freshmen.
I did also give the umber of affected college students (which was also way under 9,000) but that was only after you began changing the subject/scope of the discussion.
*I'm assuming that's supposed to read "...that I said the proposal only affected..."
**not once in this entire thread
|