View Single Post
Old 06-10-2007, 08:36 AM   #33
BrainSmashR
Banned
 
BrainSmashR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Natchitoches
Age: 54
Posts: 1,090
Rep Power: 0 BrainSmashR will become famous soon enough
Send a message via ICQ to BrainSmashR Send a message via AIM to BrainSmashR Send a message via MSN to BrainSmashR Send a message via Yahoo to BrainSmashR
Quote:
Originally Posted by joepole
>I did not specify freshman only, I gave you an estimate of the number of incoming freshman.

If you cannot see that contradiction then I am genuinely surprised you have the motor function to operate a computer keyboard.


Quote:
>My original statement was neither misleading nor unclear in any way as we can ALL see in your quote of my text.

Correct, it was neither misleading nor unclear, it was just wrong. I corrected it. then you changed the subject.
And we see here you admitting that my number was wrong, but my statement was neither misleading nor was it unclear as you indicated in your initial paragraph....and you have the audacity to use a term like contradiction.

YOU chose to argue a point I never made...namely freshman only, and that's why you're still on my ignore list.

FURTHERMORE, I never changed the subject, it's still about the proposed bill, you CHOSE to argue my numbers, and the number of people you INCORRECTLY thought I said the bill would affect rather than remain on topic. AGAIN, 100% your fault, and I'm pretty sure is a lie as well, because if you read the story then you already knew the proposed bill would affect considerbly more than incoming freshmen at NSU only. I guess it's true what they say about giving a man enough rope.


Quote:
>you are creating arguments out of nothing just for the sake of arguing

I corrected your erroneous numbers and then you began arguing against my actual, factual, legitimate numbers with ad hominem and straw man arguments.
I NEVER argued your numbers, and I'm STILL not arguing your numbers.

I'm arguing you habitual omission of several hundreds students that are also affected by the proposed law, but do not fall into the category of undergraduate student, AND your insistance that the term ONLY or a synoym of said term appeared in my initial stat. I never made the stipulaation Freshman only, I merely provided aguess at the total number of the largest group of individual affected by the law in my area . Simply put, you've just told ANOTHER lie, the logical conclusion for someone of your ilk.

Quote:
>feel free to remind me again why you were on my ignore list in the first place.

We all know why, because I constantly correct you erroneous posts.
No, it's because you lie. I'm an adult, more than capable of making mistakes, and value the input of others ESPECIALLY when I'm wrong. Unlike many of you, I appreciate the education process and I'm not ashamed to learn from other

...the "problem" is you're still trying to argue a point.

A) I never even tried to make, and

B) that you have fabricated by intentionally omitting every single clarification I have made where you have expressed an inability to think for yourself.

As I have stated numerous times, you are creating an argument out of nothing. I gave you an inaccurate estimate of the number of incoming Freshmen to NSU every fall, EVERYTHING else is the bull**** lie you're trying to perpetuate here....and look, you've even succeeded in winning the hearts of the three stooges (I guess they've already forgotten about the car seat fiasco, huh)?

Last edited by BrainSmashR; 06-10-2007 at 08:55 AM.
BrainSmashR is offline   Reply With Quote