Shreveport.com

Shreveport.com (http://www.shreveport.com/forums/index.php)
-   Local News (http://www.shreveport.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Police say that 2 year-old wasn't abused, he was tortured (http://www.shreveport.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2703)

sbl_admin 10-02-2007 10:55 AM

Police say that 2 year-old wasn't abused, he was tortured
 
Police say that 2 year-old's injuries were so severe, he wasn't abused, he was tortured

piemaker720 10-02-2007 11:26 AM

Off with their heads, the both of them, they don't deserve to live.

joepole 10-02-2007 02:17 PM

The screeching harpies of the news industry have already removed any meaning from the word "torture" so I'm not impressed anymore. This headline tells me nothing.

rhertz 10-02-2007 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joepole (Post 22013)
The screeching harpies of the news industry have already removed any meaning from the word "torture" so I'm not impressed anymore. This headline tells me nothing.

Let me take a stab at it. Torture is physically hurting someone else on purpose to fulfill an agenda, unlike an accident where there was no intent to harm anyone, it just happened due to negligence or whatever... So... How'd I do? :D

AnimeSpirit 10-02-2007 02:59 PM

These people should be in jail for life. They should never again see the light of day. :mad:

Pocahontas 10-02-2007 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joepole (Post 22013)
The screeching harpies of the news industry have already removed any meaning from the word "torture" so I'm not impressed anymore. This headline tells me nothing.

If you read the article it tells plenty! Just awful!:mad:

joepole 10-02-2007 05:06 PM

>Torture is physically hurting someone else on purpose to fulfill an agenda

That would make all warfare, execution, and even boxing "torture."

AnimeSpirit 10-02-2007 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joepole (Post 22024)
>Torture is physically hurting someone else on purpose to fulfill an agenda

That would make all warfare, execution, and even boxing "torture."

Warfare, yes, by some definitions, would be considered torture.

By execution, if you mean the conventional sense like the gas chamber and lethal injection, are painless and except for death, they do not cause physical harm.

Boxing, sure, some people might consider that torture as it can get hard to watch if you're squeemish.

My definition of torture, though, would be: "To cause physical discomfort or pain in order to persuade a subject against their will toward a certain result or goal."

piemaker720 10-02-2007 07:06 PM

<That would make all warfare, execution, and even boxing "torture.">

Boxing I would not consider torture because it is voluntary. No one has o box, no one makes you box.

Al Swearengen 10-02-2007 07:28 PM

Uh, if I may...the gas chamber is most definitly not "painless"...particularly when the condemned attempt to hold their breath, which most of em do! Typically, the throw of a lever releases a cyanide "egg" into a small acid-filled vat, producin the lethal vapors. Not to say that I personally am against this means of execution, I'm all for anything that enhances the dirtbag's sufferin.

rhertz 10-02-2007 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joepole (Post 22024)
That would make all warfare, execution, and even boxing "torture."

Yes it would. War is Hell. Hell is torture. Therefore War is torture. Execution is torture, but hey, I didn't say I was against all torture. :wink: Boxing is torture if you ask me. It pains me to watch it! But you make a good point. My definition should mention that the one being tortured didn't volunteer for the activity. Maybe the only exception being the draft.

piemaker720 10-03-2007 10:00 AM

Now come on, there are different kinds of torture. The kind that is involuntary or there is voluntary. I can't talk bad about the voluntary because hey no one made you, this is where boxing comes in. Boxing is nothing but a voluntary @ss whipping, so be it. Then you got your kinky little bedroom ventures, again voluntary. But beating a child is involuntary and that is bad. So torture to me is anything that is done involuntary, against someone's will. :D:D:D

rhertz 10-04-2007 11:14 AM

I've seen these shows on the Discovery Channel where some subcultures pierce people through their skin and suspend them from the ceiling, trees, etc. But since they volunteer for all that, I wonder if it could still be considered to be "torture"? Looks like it to me.


Isaac-Saxxon 10-04-2007 11:20 AM

Just watching that was torture :eek: I did not see anybody laughing that was hanging from a fish hook :nono: I would say it was not torture to them they did it by "Choice" :laugh:

piemaker720 10-04-2007 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Isaac-Saxxon (Post 22154)
Just watching that was torture :eek: I did not see anybody laughing that was hanging from a fish hook :nono: I would say it was not torture to them they did it by "Choice" :laugh:


You can't torture someone that enjoys it.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
2008 Shreveport.com