Shreveport.com - Rev. Jerry Falwell Is Dead

Shreveport.com (http://www.shreveport.com/forums/index.php)

- Politics (http://www.shreveport.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=5)

- - Rev. Jerry Falwell Is Dead (http://www.shreveport.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1464)

>You'll notice I don't claim to be an "expert" in ALL fields, but religion DOES happen to be one of them

That's a relief, because law and math certainly aren't.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Swearengen

Damn...ya walked right into that one! So you're an "expert" on religion? Really? Somehow I doubt ya can back that schit up! Where did ya get your theology degree? What seminary did ya attend? What books on the subject have ya written? Where have ya lectured? Well dumbass, we're waitin...substantiate that bogus claim. This should be interestin!

Ya call yourself a supporter of the U.S. Constitution...there wouldnt BE a Constitution without the Second Amendment...thats me and all the other "gun toting pussies" that ya have so much contempt for. Or maybe you're an "expert" on Constitutional law, as well?

Expert:

1 obsolete : EXPERIENCED
2 : having, involving, or displaying special skill or knowledge derived from training or experience
synonym see PROFICIENT

You "might" notice that neither a degree nor the penning of a book are requiremenst for one to be considered an expert an any given field but rather knowledge, training, and experience. What was that you were saying about walking right into something, superstupid?

O, and you think they made it the SECOND amendment because it's NOT the most important one? BTW, there's a difference between owning a gun and owning a concealed weapons permit in 14 states, puss.

Like I said, I've seen what passes for intelligence over here.

>O, and you think they made it the SECOND amendment because it's NOT the most important one?

That is the dumbest argument I've ever read on the Internet.

Quote:

Originally Posted by joepole

>O, and you think they made it the SECOND amendment because it's NOT the most important one?

That is the dumbest argument I've ever read on the Internet.

If he only had a brain :laugh: :rotflol: self taught he is :rolleyes:

Oh great... It's Devil and DevilSmashr........

Quote:

That is the dumbest argument I've ever read on the Internet.

Well first you'd have to possess the mental ability to understand that numbers fall in sequence before you can understand a concept like first and second.

...but don't bother yourself, stupid. Unless someone quotes you again, you're simply wasting your time trying to talk to me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrainSmashR

:argue: :mad!: :throwup:

Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that the Amendments are in any particular oder for any reason having to do with their importance. It is ludicrous to think that they are.

That would be him "ludicrous" I think he has his own band :laugh: :laugh:

Is it equally ludicrous to assume the first 10 are SOOOOO much more important than the others that they were set aside and even given a special name?

...stupid

Try to edit your writing of unnecessary material before attempting to impress us with your insight. :rolleyes:

No one is trying to impress you zealot. It's called debate, and the first sign someone knows they've lost is an attempt to change the subject with every new post.

If you aren't an idiot, you made a world-class effort at simulating one. ;)

LAF

Well I HAVE seen what passes for intelligence around here.

Why would you stay if you think you are so much smarter than the rest of us little people ? :nono: Oh bother :laugh: maybe you should post in your home town I am sure there are others like you there :D May you choke on the queasy, convulsing nausea of your own trite, foolish beliefs. :laugh: