View Single Post
Old 11-21-2006, 10:36 PM   #4
rhertz
SBLive! Veteran
 
rhertz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,834
Rep Power: 294 rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future rhertz has a brilliant future
Well the judge said one reason was to save taxpayer dollars on his healthcare while he would be in prison. In the surface, this makes sense, but when is saving taxpayer dollars a big priority for judges? Saving taxpayer dollars has nothing to do with sentencing or punishment to begin with. On that basis we wouldn't try anyone on capital punishment because of the relatively high cost compared to life in prison.
rhertz is offline   Reply With Quote